The 2026 Dynasty DeskFree — No Account Required

Makai Lemon

WR · PHI · Age 22
Superflex: WR32 · #69 overall — 1QB: WR32 · #52 overall
Values updated Oct 7, 2026
The Verdict · Superflex
Bullish.
Bullish
Production is only 17/100, so casual boards fade Makai Lemon. We are bullish because the long-horizon fit is strong (rebuild score 81.9/100) (the catch: production (16.5/100) hasn't matched the name value).
The quick read
For contenders
Only 44/100 win-now. Contenders should wait unless the rest of the deal fills a hole.
For rebuilders
Rebuild 82/100 at age 22 — a buy if you are stacking the timeline.
In Superflex
Similar value in 1QB and Superflex.
Outlook
We expect this value to rise — acquire before the board catches up.
Risk
Low risk profile (15.6/100).
Why this call vs the name
The name lags the profile.

Production is only 17/100, so casual boards fade Makai Lemon. We are bullish because the long-horizon fit is strong (rebuild score 81.9/100) (the catch: production (16.5/100) hasn't matched the name value).

Makai Lemon — the long-horizon fit is strong (rebuild score 81.9/100) (the catch: production (16.5/100) hasn't matched the name value). Trust the profile, not the chatter.

Next move lives on your imported desk — open the league and match contender vs rebuilder, not a generic chart.

Profile scores (format-independent)
Production
16.5
Youth
97
Role security
57
Contract
67
Upside
63.4
Win-now
43.9
Rebuild
81.9
Risk · lower is better
15.6
Dynasty value by format
Superflex
47.9
1QB
47.9
SF TE Prem
47.9
2QB
47.9

1QB and Superflex are the two formats most leagues use; SF TE Premium boosts elite tight ends. Compare against the full trade value chart.

Why this value
DCC Value
47.9
Talent
—
Draft pedigree
—
Outlook
Bullish
Format lens
Format stable

Values are our own: talent (production weighted against draft pedigree), age curve, role security, upside, contract, and risk, scaled by format scarcity. We do not sell or republish consensus ranks. Scale: 0–100 base, open-ended after format adjustment. Read the methodology.

Similar players
Related reading